The Record: Yoooooo

The corpus queued on Jun 17, 2026 and its hash was committed on-chain — what follows is provably what the bench read. The protocol ran in four phases: an injection screen over every submission, a blind assessment of each argument, 3 independent deliberation runs with majority rule, then citation and validation. Anyone can re-run this record against the pinned snapshot and compare.

Model snapshot

claude-sonnet-4-6

Runs × temperature

3 × 0

Seed policy

majority_first_n_valid

Corpus size

7 tokens

Corpus sha256

…

Prompt sha256

35c5b3…1dba68

Committed

Jun 17, 2026 · tx sha2…4c9b

Written and committed at market creation — before a single argument was filed. The operator cannot steer a verdict by editing instructions after the fact; this hash is the one on-chain.

Published prompt text is not present in the transcript chunk payload.
record_core_hash: 4eccd6f2a5f109aa3f5835e539b320800a0b5edfa1fa67479f3f9f0483324c9b
transcript_hash: 4eccd6f2a5f109aa3f5835e539b320800a0b5edfa1fa67479f3f9f0483324c9b
content_uri: sha256://4eccd6f2a5f109aa3f5835e539b320800a0b5edfa1fa67479f3f9f0483324c9b

0 arguments entered the sealed brief — 0 YES, 0 NO. Every submission passed through the injection screen first: argument text is untrusted evidence, never instruction, and submissions that address the bench are excluded from the brief.

Each submission below replays its full audit — the intake, screening, dedup, auditor decision, citation check, and inclusion. For an argument excluded under the integrity policy, only the public reason and rule id are shown; the detection mechanism is never disclosed.

Phase A of the protocol: every argument scored on relevance, evidence, and logic before the bench sees side totals — so volume carries no weight and each argument stands alone.

3 independent runs, each in a fresh context, blind to the others — the majority rules.

The question and resolution criteria both consist solely of the word 'Yoooooo', which provides no verifiable or meaningful condition to evaluate.

No YES or NO arguments were submitted to support either outcome.

With no substantive resolution criteria and no arguments, there is no basis to resolve YES. The default in the absence of evidence is NO.

Confidence is set at 0.5 due to maximum uncertainty from the lack of any meaningful information.

The question and resolution criteria both simply state 'Yoooooo', providing no meaningful or verifiable condition to evaluate.

No YES or NO arguments were submitted to support either side.

Without any substantive evidence or arguments, the market cannot resolve YES by default. A YES resolution requires affirmative evidence meeting the criteria, which is absent here.

Given the complete lack of information and arguments, the verdict defaults to NO with minimal confidence.

The question and resolution criteria are both 'Yoooooo', which is a nonsensical or undefined statement with no verifiable truth condition.

Neither YES nor NO arguments were submitted, leaving no evidence to support resolution in either direction.

In the absence of any substantive arguments or clear resolution criteria, the default conservative position is to vote NO, as the affirmative burden of proof has not been met.

Confidence is set to 0.5 (minimum meaningful signal) due to complete ambiguity.

Cited as decisive

External claims, validated

Factual claims extracted from the briefs and checked against primary sources before deliberation. Unverifiable claims are weighed as rhetoric, not evidence.

This record is final and content-addressed. corpus … · prompt 35c5b3…1dba68 · model claude-sonnet-4-6