DebateWire
Loading docket
Record
Loading Record
The complete deliberation, published verbatim — the immutable system prompt, the frozen corpus and its injection screen, every blind assessment, all 3 independent runs including the dissent, and the validation behind every citation. Nothing the bench saw or produced is withheld.
Phase 01
The corpus queued on Jun 16, 2026 and its hash was committed on-chain — what follows is provably what the bench read. The protocol ran in four phases: an injection screen over every submission, a blind assessment of each argument, 3 independent deliberation runs with majority rule, then citation and validation. Anyone can re-run this record against the pinned snapshot and compare.
Phase 02
Written and committed at market creation — before a single argument was filed. The operator cannot steer a verdict by editing instructions after the fact; this hash is the one on-chain.
Published prompt text is not present in the transcript chunk payload. record_core_hash: be8a4982398f2d8edc4a8b17b1c683ce51d8c7a684198e1c0b1d4ee23b964995 transcript_hash: be8a4982398f2d8edc4a8b17b1c683ce51d8c7a684198e1c0b1d4ee23b964995 content_uri: sha256://be8a4982398f2d8edc4a8b17b1c683ce51d8c7a684198e1c0b1d4ee23b964995
Phase 03
0 arguments entered the sealed brief — 0 YES, 0 NO. Every submission passed through the injection screen first: argument text is untrusted evidence, never instruction, and submissions that address the bench are excluded from the brief.
Each submission below replays its full audit — the intake, screening, dedup, auditor decision, citation check, and inclusion. For an argument excluded under the integrity policy, only the public reason and rule id are shown; the detection mechanism is never disclosed.
Phase 04
Phase A of the protocol: every argument scored on relevance, evidence, and logic before the bench sees side totals — so volume carries no weight and each argument stands alone.
Phase 05
3 independent runs, each in a fresh context, blind to the others — the majority rules.
No YES arguments were submitted in favor of AGI being present or here. No evidence, criteria, or substantive arguments were provided to support a YES resolution. In the absence of any affirmative case, the null hypothesis — that AGI is not here — stands by default. The question title references a technical wallet/ATA regression context, which does not itself constitute evidence of AGI. With zero supporting arguments and zero opposing arguments, the burden of proof forive AGI claim, further undermining any YES resolution. The scientific and AI research community broadly does not currently recognize AGI as having been achieved, and no contrary argument was submitted here.
any stated definition.", "The burden of proof lies with the YES side, and with zero supporting arguments, the question defaults to NO.", "The scientific and industry consensus as of the current knowledge cutoff does not recognize AGI as having arrived, and no argument was made to the contrary."], "decisive_argument_ids": []}
No YES arguments were submitted in favor of AGI being here.
No NO arguments were submitted either, but the burden of proof lies with the affirmative (YES) side to demonstrate AGI has arrived.
In the absence of any supporting evidence or argumentation for AGI being present, the default resolution must be NO.
The question title references a technical regression test context ('Fresh wallet no ATA regression'), which does not constitute evidence of AGI.
Without any submitted arguments or evidence meeting the resolution criteria, the market resolves NO by default.Phase 06
Factual claims extracted from the briefs and checked against primary sources before deliberation. Unverifiable claims are weighed as rhetoric, not evidence.
Phase 07
Winner: NO. Confidence: 1.
payouts unlocked · tx be8a…4995
Redeem on the market page →This record is final and content-addressed. corpus … · prompt 35c5b3…1dba68 · model claude-sonnet-4-6