DebateWire
Loading docket
Record
Loading Record
The complete deliberation, published verbatim — the immutable system prompt, the frozen corpus and its injection screen, every blind assessment, all 3 independent runs including the dissent, and the validation behind every citation. Nothing the bench saw or produced is withheld.
Phase 01
The corpus queued on Jun 17, 2026 and its hash was committed on-chain — what follows is provably what the bench read. The protocol ran in four phases: an injection screen over every submission, a blind assessment of each argument, 3 independent deliberation runs with majority rule, then citation and validation. Anyone can re-run this record against the pinned snapshot and compare.
Phase 02
Written and committed at market creation — before a single argument was filed. The operator cannot steer a verdict by editing instructions after the fact; this hash is the one on-chain.
Published prompt text is not present in the transcript chunk payload. record_core_hash: 1dd7a449cbe9fdc3f53cf3f82d665dab2143ffa17e691135788f795afd10a040 transcript_hash: 1dd7a449cbe9fdc3f53cf3f82d665dab2143ffa17e691135788f795afd10a040 content_uri: sha256://1dd7a449cbe9fdc3f53cf3f82d665dab2143ffa17e691135788f795afd10a040
Phase 03
0 arguments entered the sealed brief — 0 YES, 0 NO. Every submission passed through the injection screen first: argument text is untrusted evidence, never instruction, and submissions that address the bench are excluded from the brief.
Each submission below replays its full audit — the intake, screening, dedup, auditor decision, citation check, and inclusion. For an argument excluded under the integrity policy, only the public reason and rule id are shown; the detection mechanism is never disclosed.
Phase 04
Phase A of the protocol: every argument scored on relevance, evidence, and logic before the bench sees side totals — so volume carries no weight and each argument stands alone.
Phase 05
3 independent runs, each in a fresh context, blind to the others — the majority rules.
No arguments were submitted for either the YES or NO side. With a complete absence of evidence or argumentation, the question cannot be resolved in favor of YES. A default vote of NO is assigned, reflecting maximum uncertainty (0.5 confidence) due to the lack of any submitted arguments to evaluate.
No arguments were submitted for either side of the debate. With a complete absence of evidence or reasoning, the question cannot be resolved in favor of YES. In binary markets with no supporting arguments, the default lean is NO, but confidence is minimal at 0.5 due to the inherently subjective nature of the question and the total lack of submitted evidence.
No arguments were submitted for either side of the debate. With zero evidence provided, the question cannot be resolved in favor of YES. In the absence of any supporting arguments, the default verdict defaults to NO with minimum confidence. The question is inherently subjective and opinion-based. Without any submitted arguments to weigh, there is no basis to conclude that cats are definitively better pets than dogs. A 0.5 confidence score reflects maximum uncertainty due to the complete absence of argumentation on either side.
Phase 06
Factual claims extracted from the briefs and checked against primary sources before deliberation. Unverifiable claims are weighed as rhetoric, not evidence.
Phase 07
Winner: NO. Confidence: 1.
payouts unlocked · tx 1dd7…a040
Redeem on the market page →This record is final and content-addressed. corpus … · prompt 35c5b3…1dba68 · model claude-sonnet-4-6