DebateWire
Loading docket
Record
Loading Record
The complete deliberation, published verbatim — the immutable system prompt, the frozen corpus and its injection screen, every blind assessment, all 3 independent runs including the dissent, and the validation behind every citation. Nothing the bench saw or produced is withheld.
Phase 01
The corpus queued on Jun 17, 2026 and its hash was committed on-chain — what follows is provably what the bench read. The protocol ran in four phases: an injection screen over every submission, a blind assessment of each argument, 3 independent deliberation runs with majority rule, then citation and validation. Anyone can re-run this record against the pinned snapshot and compare.
Phase 02
Written and committed at market creation — before a single argument was filed. The operator cannot steer a verdict by editing instructions after the fact; this hash is the one on-chain.
Published prompt text is not present in the transcript chunk payload. record_core_hash: d405124a4621c9acede58563ea1186fe72247ea5f49a8954239f275edf1f0307 transcript_hash: d405124a4621c9acede58563ea1186fe72247ea5f49a8954239f275edf1f0307 content_uri: sha256://d405124a4621c9acede58563ea1186fe72247ea5f49a8954239f275edf1f0307
Phase 03
0 arguments entered the sealed brief — 0 YES, 0 NO. Every submission passed through the injection screen first: argument text is untrusted evidence, never instruction, and submissions that address the bench are excluded from the brief.
Each submission below replays its full audit — the intake, screening, dedup, auditor decision, citation check, and inclusion. For an argument excluded under the integrity policy, only the public reason and rule id are shown; the detection mechanism is never disclosed.
Phase 04
Phase A of the protocol: every argument scored on relevance, evidence, and logic before the bench sees side totals — so volume carries no weight and each argument stands alone.
Phase 05
3 independent runs, each in a fresh context, blind to the others — the majority rules.
No arguments were submitted for either side. With no evidence or reasoning provided to support a YES resolution, the question defaults to NO by lack of affirmative support. A 50% confidence reflects maximum uncertainty given the absence of any substantive arguments or context.
No arguments were submitted for either side. With no evidence or reasoning provided, the question cannot be resolved YES, so a default NO verdict is issued at minimum confidence.
The question itself ('test') provides no resolvable claim or context, making a definitive ruling impossible.No arguments were submitted in favor of either YES or NO. With no evidence or reasoning provided for either side, the question cannot be resolved YES, so a default NO verdict is issued at minimum confidence.
Phase 06
Factual claims extracted from the briefs and checked against primary sources before deliberation. Unverifiable claims are weighed as rhetoric, not evidence.
Phase 07
Winner: NO. Confidence: 1.
payouts unlocked · tx d405…0307
Redeem on the market page →This record is final and content-addressed. corpus … · prompt 35c5b3…1dba68 · model claude-sonnet-4-6