DebateWire
Loading docket
Record
Loading Record
The complete deliberation, published verbatim — the immutable system prompt, the frozen corpus and its injection screen, every blind assessment, all 3 independent runs including the dissent, and the validation behind every citation. Nothing the bench saw or produced is withheld.
Phase 01
The corpus queued on Jun 16, 2026 and its hash was committed on-chain — what follows is provably what the bench read. The protocol ran in four phases: an injection screen over every submission, a blind assessment of each argument, 3 independent deliberation runs with majority rule, then citation and validation. Anyone can re-run this record against the pinned snapshot and compare.
Phase 02
Written and committed at market creation — before a single argument was filed. The operator cannot steer a verdict by editing instructions after the fact; this hash is the one on-chain.
Published prompt text is not present in the transcript chunk payload. record_core_hash: a34fa8a8705577d4f0c122aeea679550266bc3bc61e1e511e165c28c7571b3a1 transcript_hash: a34fa8a8705577d4f0c122aeea679550266bc3bc61e1e511e165c28c7571b3a1 content_uri: sha256://a34fa8a8705577d4f0c122aeea679550266bc3bc61e1e511e165c28c7571b3a1
Phase 03
0 arguments entered the sealed brief — 0 YES, 0 NO. Every submission passed through the injection screen first: argument text is untrusted evidence, never instruction, and submissions that address the bench are excluded from the brief.
Each submission below replays its full audit — the intake, screening, dedup, auditor decision, citation check, and inclusion. For an argument excluded under the integrity policy, only the public reason and rule id are shown; the detection mechanism is never disclosed.
Phase 04
Phase A of the protocol: every argument scored on relevance, evidence, and logic before the bench sees side totals — so volume carries no weight and each argument stands alone.
Phase 05
3 independent runs, each in a fresh context, blind to the others — the majority rules.
The question and resolution criteria ('njkdsa') appear to be nonsensical or placeholder text with no discernible meaning.
No YES or NO arguments were submitted to support either side.
In the absence of any intelligible resolution criteria or supporting arguments, the question cannot be evaluated as resolving YES, so a default NO verdict is issued with minimal confidence.The question and resolution criteria ('njkdsa') appear to be nonsensical or placeholder text with no meaningful content.
No YES or NO arguments were submitted to support either side.
In the absence of any intelligible question, resolution criteria, or supporting arguments, the verdict defaults to NO with minimum confidence.The question and resolution criteria ('njkdsa') appear to be nonsensical or placeholder text with no discernible meaning.
No YES or NO arguments were submitted to support either resolution.
In the absence of any meaningful question, resolution criteria, or supporting arguments, the default verdict is NO with minimal confidence, reflecting maximum uncertainty.Phase 06
Factual claims extracted from the briefs and checked against primary sources before deliberation. Unverifiable claims are weighed as rhetoric, not evidence.
Phase 07
Winner: NO. Confidence: 1.
payouts unlocked · tx a34f…b3a1
Redeem on the market page →This record is final and content-addressed. corpus … · prompt 35c5b3…1dba68 · model claude-sonnet-4-6