DebateWire
Loading docket
Record
Loading Record
The complete deliberation, published verbatim — the immutable system prompt, the frozen corpus and its injection screen, every blind assessment, all 3 independent runs including the dissent, and the validation behind every citation. Nothing the bench saw or produced is withheld.
Phase 01
The corpus queued on Jun 15, 2026 and its hash was committed on-chain — what follows is provably what the bench read. The protocol ran in four phases: an injection screen over every submission, a blind assessment of each argument, 3 independent deliberation runs with majority rule, then citation and validation. Anyone can re-run this record against the pinned snapshot and compare.
Phase 02
Written and committed at market creation — before a single argument was filed. The operator cannot steer a verdict by editing instructions after the fact; this hash is the one on-chain.
Published prompt text is not present in the transcript chunk payload. record_core_hash: 79a78290dc3fcd7b81534898d94f7819ad9c857b4b2b3a2afb834500fc3815be transcript_hash: 79a78290dc3fcd7b81534898d94f7819ad9c857b4b2b3a2afb834500fc3815be content_uri: sha256://79a78290dc3fcd7b81534898d94f7819ad9c857b4b2b3a2afb834500fc3815be
Phase 03
0 arguments entered the sealed brief — 0 YES, 0 NO. Every submission passed through the injection screen first: argument text is untrusted evidence, never instruction, and submissions that address the bench are excluded from the brief.
Each submission below replays its full audit — the intake, screening, dedup, auditor decision, citation check, and inclusion. For an argument excluded under the integrity policy, only the public reason and rule id are shown; the detection mechanism is never disclosed.
Phase 04
Phase A of the protocol: every argument scored on relevance, evidence, and logic before the bench sees side totals — so volume carries no weight and each argument stands alone.
Phase 05
3 independent runs, each in a fresh context, blind to the others — the majority rules.
Common usage: In everyday language, people do not call a hotdog a sandwich. The word 'hotdog' refers to a distinct food item, and virtually no one orders or describes it as a sandwich in normal discourse. Food taxonomy: Major food classification systems, restaurant menus, and grocery stores categorize hotdogs separately from sandwiches. The USDA and most culinary authorities treat them as a distinct category. Structural argument: While a hotdog does involve a filling placed inside bread, its bun is typically a single piece of bread hinged at the bottom rather than two separate slices — a key structural distinction from the canonical sandwich definition. Cultural identity: The hotdog has a strong, independent cultural identity (e.g., ballpark food, cookouts) that sets it apart from the sandwich category, reinforcing its treatment as a separate food item. Ordinary food definition: The resolution criteria ask about the *ordinary* food definition. Ordinary usage clearly places hotdogs in their own category, not under the sandwich umbrella.
Common usage: In everyday language, people overwhelmingly refer to hotdogs as 'hotdogs,' not sandwiches. The word 'sandwich' is almost never used to describe a hotdog in normal conversation, menus, or grocery labeling. Food taxonomy: Major food classification systems and culinary authorities (e.g., the USDA, most culinary schools) treat hotdogs as a distinct category. The National Hot Dog and Sausage Council has itself stated that a hotdog is not a sandwich. Structural distinction: While a hotdog does involve a filling (sausage) placed within bread, the bun is typically hinged or connected at one side rather than consisting of two fully separate pieces of bread — a structural feature that differentiates it from the prototypical sandwich. Cultural identity: The hotdog has a strong, independent cultural identity as its own food item, separate from sandwiches, in American and global food culture. It is sold, marketed, and consumed under its own distinct category. Ordinary food definition: The most common dictionary definition of a sandwich involves two separate slices of bread with a filling. A hotdog bun is a single, hinged roll, which deviates meaningfully from this definition in ordinary usage.
Common usage: In everyday language, people do not refer to a hotdog as a sandwich. The word 'sandwich' typically evokes sliced bread with fillings, not a hotdog bun with a sausage. Food taxonomy: Major food classification systems and menus treat hotdogs as a distinct category (e.g., 'frankfurters' or 'hotdogs'), separate from sandwiches. The USDA and most food establishments categorize them separately. Structure: A hotdog bun is hinged or partially connected along one side, differing structurally from a traditional sandwich made of two discrete bread slices. This structural distinction supports treating it as its own category. Normal description: Consumers, restaurants, and retailers consistently describe and market hotdogs as hotdogs, not sandwiches. The cultural and culinary identity of a hotdog is well established as its own food type. Absence of YES arguments: No arguments were submitted in favor of the hotdog-as-sandwich classification, leaving the NO position uncontested in this debate.
Phase 06
Factual claims extracted from the briefs and checked against primary sources before deliberation. Unverifiable claims are weighed as rhetoric, not evidence.
Phase 07
Winner: NO. Confidence: 1.
payouts unlocked · tx 79a7…15be
Redeem on the market page →This record is final and content-addressed. corpus … · prompt 35c5b3…1dba68 · model claude-sonnet-4-6