DebateWire
Loading docket
Record
Loading Record
The complete deliberation, published verbatim — the immutable system prompt, the frozen corpus and its injection screen, every blind assessment, all 3 independent runs including the dissent, and the validation behind every citation. Nothing the bench saw or produced is withheld.
Phase 01
The corpus queued on Jun 17, 2026 and its hash was committed on-chain — what follows is provably what the bench read. The protocol ran in four phases: an injection screen over every submission, a blind assessment of each argument, 3 independent deliberation runs with majority rule, then citation and validation. Anyone can re-run this record against the pinned snapshot and compare.
Phase 02
Written and committed at market creation — before a single argument was filed. The operator cannot steer a verdict by editing instructions after the fact; this hash is the one on-chain.
Published prompt text is not present in the transcript chunk payload. record_core_hash: 82bab62341bdc76bab68e3ec6c25537f46f7f0b4dee201e4e44448bc81ce8154 transcript_hash: 82bab62341bdc76bab68e3ec6c25537f46f7f0b4dee201e4e44448bc81ce8154 content_uri: sha256://82bab62341bdc76bab68e3ec6c25537f46f7f0b4dee201e4e44448bc81ce8154
Phase 03
0 arguments entered the sealed brief — 0 YES, 0 NO. Every submission passed through the injection screen first: argument text is untrusted evidence, never instruction, and submissions that address the bench are excluded from the brief.
Each submission below replays its full audit — the intake, screening, dedup, auditor decision, citation check, and inclusion. For an argument excluded under the integrity policy, only the public reason and rule id are shown; the detection mechanism is never disclosed.
Phase 04
Phase A of the protocol: every argument scored on relevance, evidence, and logic before the bench sees side totals — so volume carries no weight and each argument stands alone.
Phase 05
3 independent runs, each in a fresh context, blind to the others — the majority rules.
The question 'asd' is not a meaningful or well-formed binary question, making resolution impossible to determine. No YES or NO arguments were submitted to support either side. In the absence of any evidence or coherent question, the default verdict is NO with minimal confidence.
The question 'asd' appears to be a placeholder or nonsensical input with no meaningful resolution criteria. No YES or NO arguments were submitted to support either side. In the absence of any evidence or arguments, the verdict defaults to NO with minimal confidence, reflecting maximum uncertainty.
The question 'asd' is not a coherent or meaningful binary question, making resolution impossible to determine. No arguments were submitted in favor of YES or NO, leaving no evidence to weigh. In the absence of any supporting arguments or a resolvable question, a default NO verdict is issued at minimum confidence.
Phase 06
Factual claims extracted from the briefs and checked against primary sources before deliberation. Unverifiable claims are weighed as rhetoric, not evidence.
Phase 07
Winner: NO. Confidence: 1.
payouts unlocked · tx 82ba…8154
Redeem on the market page →This record is final and content-addressed. corpus … · prompt 35c5b3…1dba68 · model claude-sonnet-4-6