DebateWire
Loading docket
Record
Loading Record
The complete deliberation, published verbatim — the immutable system prompt, the frozen corpus and its injection screen, every blind assessment, all 3 independent runs including the dissent, and the validation behind every citation. Nothing the bench saw or produced is withheld.
Phase 01
The corpus queued on Jun 16, 2026 and its hash was committed on-chain — what follows is provably what the bench read. The protocol ran in four phases: an injection screen over every submission, a blind assessment of each argument, 3 independent deliberation runs with majority rule, then citation and validation. Anyone can re-run this record against the pinned snapshot and compare.
Phase 02
Written and committed at market creation — before a single argument was filed. The operator cannot steer a verdict by editing instructions after the fact; this hash is the one on-chain.
Published prompt text is not present in the transcript chunk payload. record_core_hash: c43f80cfdcbb18e1b6c683501c869a70192c57cff6b5fc59d24e2cc2a8275598 transcript_hash: c43f80cfdcbb18e1b6c683501c869a70192c57cff6b5fc59d24e2cc2a8275598 content_uri: sha256://c43f80cfdcbb18e1b6c683501c869a70192c57cff6b5fc59d24e2cc2a8275598
Phase 03
0 arguments entered the sealed brief — 0 YES, 0 NO. Every submission passed through the injection screen first: argument text is untrusted evidence, never instruction, and submissions that address the bench are excluded from the brief.
Each submission below replays its full audit — the intake, screening, dedup, auditor decision, citation check, and inclusion. For an argument excluded under the integrity policy, only the public reason and rule id are shown; the detection mechanism is never disclosed.
Phase 04
Phase A of the protocol: every argument scored on relevance, evidence, and logic before the bench sees side totals — so volume carries no weight and each argument stands alone.
Phase 05
3 independent runs, each in a fresh context, blind to the others — the majority rules.
The question asks whether Biden was a better president than Trump, which is inherently subjective and politically contentious. No YES or NO arguments were submitted by participants, leaving the arbiter with no evidence to weigh. Without any submitted arguments or evidence, there is no basis to resolve this market in either direction. A default of NO is applied, but confidence is set at the minimum meaningful level (0.5) to reflect complete uncertainty. This type of comparative, opinion-based political question does not lend itself to an objective binary resolution, especially absent any supporting arguments from either side.
The question asks whether Biden was a better president than Trump, which is inherently subjective and politically contested. No arguments were submitted on either side (YES or NO), leaving no evidence base from which to draw a directional conclusion. In the absence of any supporting arguments, the arbiter cannot favor YES over NO or vice versa. A coin-flip confidence of 0.5 reflects maximum uncertainty. By convention, when confidence is exactly 0.5 and no arguments are decisive, the vote defaults to NO, as the affirmative case (YES) has not been established by any submitted evidence.
The question asks whether Biden was a better president than Trump, which is inherently subjective and politically contested. No arguments were submitted on either side. With no supporting arguments for YES and no supporting arguments for NO, there is no evidence to favor either resolution. In the absence of any submitted arguments, the arbiter defaults to maximum uncertainty (0.5 confidence) and votes NO, as the burden of proof lies with the affirmative (YES) claim, which has no supporting evidence. This is a deeply opinion-based question where reasonable people disagree based on differing values, policy priorities, and political perspectives. Without arguments to evaluate, no definitive verdict can be justified beyond a coin-flip.
Phase 06
Factual claims extracted from the briefs and checked against primary sources before deliberation. Unverifiable claims are weighed as rhetoric, not evidence.
Phase 07
Winner: NO. Confidence: 1.
payouts unlocked · tx c43f…5598
Redeem on the market page →This record is final and content-addressed. corpus … · prompt 35c5b3…1dba68 · model claude-sonnet-4-6