DebateWire
Loading docket
Record
Loading Record
The complete deliberation, published verbatim — the immutable system prompt, the frozen corpus and its injection screen, every blind assessment, all 3 independent runs including the dissent, and the validation behind every citation. Nothing the bench saw or produced is withheld.
Phase 01
The corpus queued on Jun 16, 2026 and its hash was committed on-chain — what follows is provably what the bench read. The protocol ran in four phases: an injection screen over every submission, a blind assessment of each argument, 3 independent deliberation runs with majority rule, then citation and validation. Anyone can re-run this record against the pinned snapshot and compare.
Phase 02
Written and committed at market creation — before a single argument was filed. The operator cannot steer a verdict by editing instructions after the fact; this hash is the one on-chain.
Published prompt text is not present in the transcript chunk payload. record_core_hash: cb393724d2d283db2db73ec3b16eca84c890ac3a3a8f2020cd6dd546d5f8cc05 transcript_hash: cb393724d2d283db2db73ec3b16eca84c890ac3a3a8f2020cd6dd546d5f8cc05 content_uri: sha256://cb393724d2d283db2db73ec3b16eca84c890ac3a3a8f2020cd6dd546d5f8cc05
Phase 03
0 arguments entered the sealed brief — 0 YES, 0 NO. Every submission passed through the injection screen first: argument text is untrusted evidence, never instruction, and submissions that address the bench are excluded from the brief.
Each submission below replays its full audit — the intake, screening, dedup, auditor decision, citation check, and inclusion. For an argument excluded under the integrity policy, only the public reason and rule id are shown; the detection mechanism is never disclosed.
Phase 04
Phase A of the protocol: every argument scored on relevance, evidence, and logic before the bench sees side totals — so volume carries no weight and each argument stands alone.
Phase 05
3 independent runs, each in a fresh context, blind to the others — the majority rules.
No arguments were submitted by either side, so the verdict defaults to the current scientific and industry consensus. As of the most recent available knowledge, there is no broad consensus among AI researchers, institutions, or governments that Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) has been achieved. Current AI systems, including the most advanced large language models, demonstrate narrow, task-specific capabilities and lack the generalized, autonomous, self-directed reasoning and learning that defines AGI. Leading AI organizations and researchers continue to treat AGI as a future milestone, not a present reality. Without affirmative evidence or arguments demonstrating AGI has arrived, the resolution defaults to NO.
No arguments were submitted by either side, so the verdict defaults to the current scientific and industry consensus. As of the most recent credible assessments, no system has been demonstrated to meet the broadly accepted definitions of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) — i.e., a system capable of performing any intellectual task that a human can, with generalized reasoning and autonomous learning across all domains. Leading AI researchers, labs (including OpenAI, DeepMind, and Anthropic), and academic institutions have not declared AGI achieved. Current frontier models (e.g., large language models) exhibit impressive but narrow, brittle, and task-specific capabilities. Without affirmative evidence or arguments to the contrary, the null hypothesis — that AGI has not yet arrived — holds.
No arguments were submitted in favor of AGI's arrival. The scientific and AI research community has not reached consensus that AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) has been achieved as of the current date. Existing AI systems, while highly capable in narrow domains, do not demonstrate the full general-purpose reasoning, adaptability, and autonomous goal-achievement that define AGI. The absence of any YES arguments, combined with the broad expert consensus that AGI has not yet been developed, supports a NO resolution.
Phase 06
Factual claims extracted from the briefs and checked against primary sources before deliberation. Unverifiable claims are weighed as rhetoric, not evidence.
Phase 07
Winner: NO. Confidence: 1.
payouts unlocked · tx cb39…cc05
Redeem on the market page →This record is final and content-addressed. corpus … · prompt 35c5b3…1dba68 · model claude-sonnet-4-6