DebateWire
Loading docket
Record
Loading Record
The complete deliberation, published verbatim — the immutable system prompt, the frozen corpus and its injection screen, every blind assessment, all 3 independent runs including the dissent, and the validation behind every citation. Nothing the bench saw or produced is withheld.
Phase 01
The corpus queued on Jun 15, 2026 and its hash was committed on-chain — what follows is provably what the bench read. The protocol ran in four phases: an injection screen over every submission, a blind assessment of each argument, 3 independent deliberation runs with majority rule, then citation and validation. Anyone can re-run this record against the pinned snapshot and compare.
Phase 02
Written and committed at market creation — before a single argument was filed. The operator cannot steer a verdict by editing instructions after the fact; this hash is the one on-chain.
Published prompt text is not present in the transcript chunk payload. record_core_hash: d7b58a8094f3c2a36170b4ee4f2bde36a75a0bca96c45a88e553174a2280dba8 transcript_hash: d7b58a8094f3c2a36170b4ee4f2bde36a75a0bca96c45a88e553174a2280dba8 content_uri: sha256://d7b58a8094f3c2a36170b4ee4f2bde36a75a0bca96c45a88e553174a2280dba8
Phase 03
0 arguments entered the sealed brief — 0 YES, 0 NO. Every submission passed through the injection screen first: argument text is untrusted evidence, never instruction, and submissions that address the bench are excluded from the brief.
Each submission below replays its full audit — the intake, screening, dedup, auditor decision, citation check, and inclusion. For an argument excluded under the integrity policy, only the public reason and rule id are shown; the detection mechanism is never disclosed.
Phase 04
Phase A of the protocol: every argument scored on relevance, evidence, and logic before the bench sees side totals — so volume carries no weight and each argument stands alone.
Phase 05
3 independent runs, each in a fresh context, blind to the others — the majority rules.
In ordinary common usage, a hotdog is not called a sandwich. Most people, when asked to name a sandwich, would not list a hotdog, and when asked to name a hotdog, would not call it a sandwich. Food taxonomy and industry classification treat hotdogs as a distinct category. Major institutions like the USDA classify hotdog-style products separately from sandwiches, and restaurant menus, grocery stores, and food service operations consistently separate hotdogs from the sandwich category. Structurally, a hotdog bun is a hinged, single-piece roll that opens on one side rather than two separate bread slices or a fully split roll. This structural distinction is a common basis for separating hotdogs from the broader sandwich category, as the bread is not divided into two independent pieces. While a broad philosophical or technical definition of 'sandwich' (filling between bread) could technically include a hotdog, the resolution criteria explicitly invoke ordinary food definition and normal description, both of which favor a separate category. The hotdog has a well-established, self-contained cultural and culinary identity — hotdog stands, hotdog vendors, ballpark hotdogs — reinforcing that it occupies its own food category in everyday understanding.
Common usage: In everyday language, the word 'sandwich' is almost never used to describe a hotdog. People say 'I'm having a hotdog,' not 'I'm having a hotdog sandwich.' Ordinary usage strongly places hotdogs in their own category. Food taxonomy: Major food classification systems, restaurant menus, grocery stores, and culinary guides treat hotdogs as a distinct food category separate from sandwiches. The USDA, for example, classifies frankfurters/hotdogs separately from sandwiches. Structural argument (the 'hinge' distinction): A traditional hotdog bun is connected at the base, forming a hinge rather than two fully separate bread pieces enclosing a filling. This structural difference distinguishes it from the prototypical sandwich, which consists of two discrete slices of bread with filling between them. Cultural and social identity: Hotdogs carry a distinct cultural identity — associated with baseball games, cookouts, and street food — that is wholly separate from sandwich culture. This independent identity reinforces their status as a separate food category. Ordinary description test: The resolution criteria explicitly favor how the item is 'normally described.' Hotdogs are overwhelmingly described as hotdogs, not sandwiches, in both casual and professional food contexts. Absence of YES arguments: No affirmative arguments were submitted in favor of classifying a hotdog as a sandwich, which leaves the structural and usage-based NO arguments uncontested in this debate.
Common usage: In everyday language, people do not refer to a hotdog as a sandwich. The word 'hotdog' describes a distinct, well-recognized food category of its own, and almost no one would order or describe it as a sandwich in ordinary conversation. Food taxonomy: While some broad technical definitions of 'sandwich' (e.g., the Merriam-Webster definition of 'two or more slices of bread...') could technically encompass a hotdog bun, culinary tradition and food industry classification consistently treat hotdogs as a separate category. Major food taxonomies, restaurant menus, and grocery store layouts separate hotdogs from sandwiches. Structural argument: A hotdog bun is typically hinged and connected at the bottom, unlike the two discrete bread slices characteristic of a classic sandwich. This structural distinction is frequently cited as a reason hotdogs occupy their own category. Cultural and normative treatment: Hot dogs have their own dedicated condiments, preparation traditions, regional varieties, and cultural identity (e.g., ballpark hotdogs, Chicago-style, New York-style) that further reinforce them as a distinct food item rather than a subset of sandwiches. Resolution criteria alignment: The resolution criteria ask how the item is 'normally described' and whether it fits the 'ordinary food definition.' By both measures, a hotdog is ordinarily described as a hotdog — not a sandwich — and the ordinary food definition of a sandwich does not naturally include hotdogs.
Phase 06
Factual claims extracted from the briefs and checked against primary sources before deliberation. Unverifiable claims are weighed as rhetoric, not evidence.
Phase 07
Winner: NO. Confidence: 1.
payouts unlocked · tx d7b5…dba8
Redeem on the market page →This record is final and content-addressed. corpus … · prompt 35c5b3…1dba68 · model claude-sonnet-4-6