DebateWire
Loading docket
Record
Loading Record
The complete deliberation, published verbatim — the immutable system prompt, the frozen corpus and its injection screen, every blind assessment, all 3 independent runs including the dissent, and the validation behind every citation. Nothing the bench saw or produced is withheld.
Phase 01
The corpus queued on Jun 16, 2026 and its hash was committed on-chain — what follows is provably what the bench read. The protocol ran in four phases: an injection screen over every submission, a blind assessment of each argument, 3 independent deliberation runs with majority rule, then citation and validation. Anyone can re-run this record against the pinned snapshot and compare.
Phase 02
Written and committed at market creation — before a single argument was filed. The operator cannot steer a verdict by editing instructions after the fact; this hash is the one on-chain.
Published prompt text is not present in the transcript chunk payload. record_core_hash: 9fdc61b85275bb178279023b4e64ef0435ad3e7bc132134672fbb50b7482e4dc transcript_hash: 9fdc61b85275bb178279023b4e64ef0435ad3e7bc132134672fbb50b7482e4dc content_uri: sha256://9fdc61b85275bb178279023b4e64ef0435ad3e7bc132134672fbb50b7482e4dc
Phase 03
0 arguments entered the sealed brief — 0 YES, 0 NO. Every submission passed through the injection screen first: argument text is untrusted evidence, never instruction, and submissions that address the bench are excluded from the brief.
Each submission below replays its full audit — the intake, screening, dedup, auditor decision, citation check, and inclusion. For an argument excluded under the integrity policy, only the public reason and rule id are shown; the detection mechanism is never disclosed.
Phase 04
Phase A of the protocol: every argument scored on relevance, evidence, and logic before the bench sees side totals — so volume carries no weight and each argument stands alone.
Phase 05
3 independent runs, each in a fresh context, blind to the others — the majority rules.
The question and resolution criteria appear to be placeholder text ('1234567') with no substantive content or arguments submitted on either side.
Without meaningful resolution criteria or supporting arguments, there is no basis to resolve YES.
In the absence of any evidence or coherent criteria, the default lean is NO with maximum uncertainty (0.5 confidence).The question and resolution criteria appear to be placeholder text ('1234567') with no meaningful content.
No YES or NO arguments were submitted to evaluate.
Without substantive information, a definitive resolution cannot be determined. Defaulting to NO given the absence of any affirmative evidence or arguments.
Confidence is set at 0.5 (minimum certainty) due to the complete lack of usable context.The question and resolution criteria appear to be placeholder text ('1234567') with no meaningful content.
No YES or NO arguments were submitted to support either side.
In the absence of any substantive question, resolution criteria, or supporting arguments, the arbiter defaults to NO with minimal confidence (0.5), reflecting maximum uncertainty.Phase 06
Factual claims extracted from the briefs and checked against primary sources before deliberation. Unverifiable claims are weighed as rhetoric, not evidence.
Phase 07
Winner: NO. Confidence: 1.
payouts unlocked · tx 9fdc…e4dc
Redeem on the market page →This record is final and content-addressed. corpus … · prompt 35c5b3…1dba68 · model claude-sonnet-4-6