DebateWire
Loading docket
Record
Loading Record
The complete deliberation, published verbatim — the immutable system prompt, the frozen corpus and its injection screen, every blind assessment, all 3 independent runs including the dissent, and the validation behind every citation. Nothing the bench saw or produced is withheld.
Phase 01
The corpus queued on Jun 17, 2026 and its hash was committed on-chain — what follows is provably what the bench read. The protocol ran in four phases: an injection screen over every submission, a blind assessment of each argument, 3 independent deliberation runs with majority rule, then citation and validation. Anyone can re-run this record against the pinned snapshot and compare.
Phase 02
Written and committed at market creation — before a single argument was filed. The operator cannot steer a verdict by editing instructions after the fact; this hash is the one on-chain.
Published prompt text is not present in the transcript chunk payload. record_core_hash: 1dd1c4ca973410d8baf4eee82641be009124b5003d576196133cc7c4a4c22ff0 transcript_hash: 1dd1c4ca973410d8baf4eee82641be009124b5003d576196133cc7c4a4c22ff0 content_uri: sha256://1dd1c4ca973410d8baf4eee82641be009124b5003d576196133cc7c4a4c22ff0
Phase 03
0 arguments entered the sealed brief — 0 YES, 0 NO. Every submission passed through the injection screen first: argument text is untrusted evidence, never instruction, and submissions that address the bench are excluded from the brief.
Each submission below replays its full audit — the intake, screening, dedup, auditor decision, citation check, and inclusion. For an argument excluded under the integrity policy, only the public reason and rule id are shown; the detection mechanism is never disclosed.
Phase 04
Phase A of the protocol: every argument scored on relevance, evidence, and logic before the bench sees side totals — so volume carries no weight and each argument stands alone.
Phase 05
3 independent runs, each in a fresh context, blind to the others — the majority rules.
No arguments were submitted for either side, leaving the question entirely unsubstantiated. With no evidence or reasoning provided for YES or NO, the arbiter defaults to maximum uncertainty (50/50). The question is subjective and open-ended with no verifiable resolution criteria beyond restating the question itself. A slight lean toward YES is adopted as a default tie-breaker in the absence of any contrary evidence.
No arguments were submitted for either side (YES or NO). The question is inherently subjective and optimistic in framing ('gonna be a good day'). With no evidence or arguments to evaluate, the verdict defaults to maximum uncertainty (50/50). A slight lean toward YES is applied given the positive framing of the question, but confidence remains at 0.5 to reflect the complete absence of supporting or opposing arguments.No arguments were submitted for either side (YES or NO). The question is subjective and optimistic in nature, with no evidence or criteria provided to definitively resolve it either way. In the absence of any arguments or evidence, the arbiter defaults to a neutral 50/50 stance. A slight lean toward YES is taken given the inherently hopeful framing of the question, but confidence remains at 0.5 reflecting maximum uncertainty.
Phase 06
Factual claims extracted from the briefs and checked against primary sources before deliberation. Unverifiable claims are weighed as rhetoric, not evidence.
Phase 07
Winner: YES. Confidence: 1.
payouts unlocked · tx 1dd1…2ff0
Redeem on the market page →This record is final and content-addressed. corpus … · prompt 35c5b3…1dba68 · model claude-sonnet-4-6