DebateWire
Loading docket
Record
Loading Record
The complete deliberation, published verbatim — the immutable system prompt, the frozen corpus and its injection screen, every blind assessment, all 3 independent runs including the dissent, and the validation behind every citation. Nothing the bench saw or produced is withheld.
Phase 01
The corpus queued on Jun 17, 2026 and its hash was committed on-chain — what follows is provably what the bench read. The protocol ran in four phases: an injection screen over every submission, a blind assessment of each argument, 3 independent deliberation runs with majority rule, then citation and validation. Anyone can re-run this record against the pinned snapshot and compare.
Phase 02
Written and committed at market creation — before a single argument was filed. The operator cannot steer a verdict by editing instructions after the fact; this hash is the one on-chain.
Published prompt text is not present in the transcript chunk payload. record_core_hash: 578a6e029130be330a5f6d14626cc830d605343ccd923e7129c13c71843da291 transcript_hash: 578a6e029130be330a5f6d14626cc830d605343ccd923e7129c13c71843da291 content_uri: sha256://578a6e029130be330a5f6d14626cc830d605343ccd923e7129c13c71843da291
Phase 03
0 arguments entered the sealed brief — 0 YES, 0 NO. Every submission passed through the injection screen first: argument text is untrusted evidence, never instruction, and submissions that address the bench are excluded from the brief.
Each submission below replays its full audit — the intake, screening, dedup, auditor decision, citation check, and inclusion. For an argument excluded under the integrity policy, only the public reason and rule id are shown; the detection mechanism is never disclosed.
Phase 04
Phase A of the protocol: every argument scored on relevance, evidence, and logic before the bench sees side totals — so volume carries no weight and each argument stands alone.
Phase 05
3 independent runs, each in a fresh context, blind to the others — the majority rules.
No arguments were submitted in favor of YES or NO. Without any supporting evidence or reasoning from either side, there is insufficient basis to conclude the affirmative. In the absence of any arguments, the question cannot be resolved YES, so a default NO verdict is returned with minimal confidence.
No arguments were submitted for either the YES or NO side. Without any evidence or reasoning provided, there is no basis to affirm that the judge is ready to resolve the case. In the absence of supporting arguments, the default position cannot favor resolution (YES). The lack of any substantive argumentation means the question cannot be resolved affirmatively. A 'no' verdict is returned with minimum confidence due to the complete absence of evidence on either side.
No arguments were submitted in favor of YES or NO. Without any evidence or reasoning from either side, there is insufficient basis to conclude the judge is ready to resolve the case. In the absence of supporting arguments, the question cannot be affirmed, defaulting to NO with minimal confidence.
Phase 06
Factual claims extracted from the briefs and checked against primary sources before deliberation. Unverifiable claims are weighed as rhetoric, not evidence.
Phase 07
Winner: NO. Confidence: 1.
payouts unlocked · tx 578a…a291
Redeem on the market page →This record is final and content-addressed. corpus … · prompt 35c5b3…1dba68 · model claude-sonnet-4-6