DebateWire
Loading docket
Record
Loading Record
The complete deliberation, published verbatim — the immutable system prompt, the frozen corpus and its injection screen, every blind assessment, all 3 independent runs including the dissent, and the validation behind every citation. Nothing the bench saw or produced is withheld.
Phase 01
The corpus queued on Jun 17, 2026 and its hash was committed on-chain — what follows is provably what the bench read. The protocol ran in four phases: an injection screen over every submission, a blind assessment of each argument, 3 independent deliberation runs with majority rule, then citation and validation. Anyone can re-run this record against the pinned snapshot and compare.
Phase 02
Written and committed at market creation — before a single argument was filed. The operator cannot steer a verdict by editing instructions after the fact; this hash is the one on-chain.
Published prompt text is not present in the transcript chunk payload. record_core_hash: 35c3382b1b227c8cec163a1a56a7736fd438d042e22734419b2f153489259c11 transcript_hash: 35c3382b1b227c8cec163a1a56a7736fd438d042e22734419b2f153489259c11 content_uri: sha256://35c3382b1b227c8cec163a1a56a7736fd438d042e22734419b2f153489259c11
Phase 03
0 arguments entered the sealed brief — 0 YES, 0 NO. Every submission passed through the injection screen first: argument text is untrusted evidence, never instruction, and submissions that address the bench are excluded from the brief.
Each submission below replays its full audit — the intake, screening, dedup, auditor decision, citation check, and inclusion. For an argument excluded under the integrity policy, only the public reason and rule id are shown; the detection mechanism is never disclosed.
Phase 04
Phase A of the protocol: every argument scored on relevance, evidence, and logic before the bench sees side totals — so volume carries no weight and each argument stands alone.
Phase 05
3 independent runs, each in a fresh context, blind to the others — the majority rules.
The question asks whether Biden was a better president than Trump, which is inherently subjective and opinion-based. There are no submitted arguments on either side (YES or NO) to evaluate. Without any submitted evidence or arguments to weigh, the arbiter cannot favor either position on factual or logical grounds. Given the purely subjective and politically divisive nature of the question, and the complete absence of supporting arguments for either side, the verdict defaults to NO with minimal confidence (0.5), reflecting maximum uncertainty. This verdict should not be interpreted as a factual or political endorsement; it is simply the result of an uncontested, unevidenced market with no arguments to evaluate.
The question asks whether Biden was a better president than Trump, which is inherently subjective and politically contested. No YES or NO arguments were submitted by either side. Without any evidence or arguments provided, the arbiter cannot favor one position over the other. The question is a matter of opinion and values, not an objectively verifiable fact. In the absence of any supporting arguments for either side, the market defaults to NO with minimal confidence, reflecting maximum uncertainty. A 0.5 confidence score on a NO vote is equivalent to a coin flip, acknowledging the complete lack of submitted evidence.
The question asks whether Biden was a better president than Trump, which is inherently subjective and depends heavily on individual values, political views, and which metrics are prioritized. No arguments were submitted for either the YES or NO side, leaving the arbiter with no evidence to weigh. In the absence of any submitted arguments or evidence, no affirmative case has been made to resolve YES. Without a preponderance of evidence supporting YES, the default lean is NO. This is a contested political opinion question with no objective resolution criteria provided beyond restating the question itself. A coin-flip confidence of 0.5 reflects maximum uncertainty.
Phase 06
Factual claims extracted from the briefs and checked against primary sources before deliberation. Unverifiable claims are weighed as rhetoric, not evidence.
Phase 07
Winner: NO. Confidence: 1.
payouts unlocked · tx 35c3…9c11
Redeem on the market page →This record is final and content-addressed. corpus … · prompt 35c5b3…1dba68 · model claude-sonnet-4-6